Physical versions only have value of they are complete and relatively bug free, and originally purposed to avoid big downloads.

Nowadays day 1 patching may be the same size as the install or larger negating half the point. The other half is lost because almost everything is a subscription, multi-player, or delivered with too many bugs as a beta test.

Collecting physical copies is a thing, but is niche.

You mean 4 and 6

I see a 7/10 in there that seems the most honest.

They got revokeable permission apparently.

This is why when you get permission, where you must plan for a decade of work, and they are saying yes, you get them to say in perpetuity and non-revokeable.

What’s the point… It’s a bespoke device with bespoke software. Render at native…

A context aware interpolation with less overhead is a cool technology as compared to context unaware averaging. How that ends up implemented in various engines is a different topic.

Depends what you want to render. High fps requirements in conjunction with movement where the human eye is the bottleneck is a perfect interpolation case. In such a case the bad frames aren’t really seen.

Amped was better

More or less there are 2 clear use-cases: Foss trade system not centrally controlled by the game, and cross-game usage of a token. Neither is reliably implemented by a single company or centralized db.

There is nothing wrong with the core technology of using a blockchain token as a validator in a game.

Winning in the end absolutely means they will do it if this was the most cost effective method.

Doesn’t help that he’s a bitch

So you don’t want the R in RPG, and what you’ll get for that is the same generic game over and over again.