I don’t know. It seems like they’re addressing the issues that the first one had. It was too safe and far too full of itself. It should have just been one big planet and a bit less goofy. Seems like the next one is shaping up for that. Also, if there is a game company that I trust right now it’s obsidian. I was super disappointed with the ending just being the same slides they used for new Vegas, hopefully we at least get a more satisfying ending.

They’re going for James Bond but ending up with get smart.

They are years too late. The effort to make 30+ years of games, launchers and Windows based divers compatible would be staggering. The only way this happens is if they just run Windows or Linux virtually. They walled themselves off a long time ago. Now they get to suffer from it.

If people can’t get the concept of supply and demand anymore we are beyond “in trouble”.

Did you play the 2016 one or eternal? My first ever game was the first doom. Doom 3 is a great game but it just wasn’t really doom. Getting into the lore was cool though. A roommate forced me to try doom 2016 and it immediately brought back the memories and feelings, they also use and continue the lore in a non invasive way. I haven’t yet played dark ages but the modern ones are very much the successor to the originals.

The blind leading the eagle-eyed.

To translate your message: “Libertarians wrongly believe they are kings and masters.” Evidenced by the famous Highlander line “There can be only one!”

I mean. You already pay for your road and the ambulance that can drive down it to save your life. Why would you pay more to utilise the same overburdened service? Unless you’re going to pay to build a hospital, fire station, etc. what’s the point? And then the maintenance bills. Libertarians cannot wait to spend all of their money on things we currently help them pay for. (I’m Canadian by the way, just to explain the paid ambulance part)