Maybe the article is not biased, maybe, just maybe, the tech deserves this huge backlash because it is trash and nobody asked for it, not even game devs, or whatever you call people who make games but their games are not in need for this tech

If you can’t recognize bias in an obviously biased article, then your media literacy skills need work so that you can recognize different types of bias.

Hell even the current popular LLM’s, which are glorified statistics chat bots, can see this pattern and identify heavily statistical traits of bias in this article.

If you bother reading the article, you’ll note that the majority of developers interviewed are not people who would need this technology to begin with. Like all technologies, it is a choice to integrate it.

This article selected specifically for voices that were already against it/had no need for it.

Whether the tech is good or bad is irrelevant, because the article is horribly biased in one direction.

ok so I asked you to list precisely what game devs they interviewed and you gave me nothing.

Thanks for confirming you cannot parse the article of specific info.

Yeah. Did you read it? I did. Tell me what you understood from the article you read on the precisely was interviewed, because I have doubts on your reading comprehension.

you don’t have a point, there is nothing to discuss,

Nice assumption, too bad its wrong.

Remind me again exactly who was interviewed in this article and what roles they have in?

This is such a braindead take that completely misses my original point. I know reading levels have dropped globally but come on now, you can do better.

“we interviewed only haters and they all of them complained about the thing they hate”

What a garbage article.