• 0 Posts
  • 40 Comments
Joined 2Y ago
cake
Cake day: Jul 06, 2023

help-circle
rss

I can’t recall correctly. But I think that’s half-life 2, though.


Like what examples of memorable moments gone do you have?


I know of families who walk naked around the house. No kids under 10 were harmed by this. Nudity is natural. Reacting to it in an unhealthy manner is not.


In theory, the idea is okay. I wouldn’t mind an avatar having my own voice.

In practice, fuck no. It’s EA. I don’t want my voice to live on producing new dialogue long after I’m dead in order to fill some corporation’s pockets.






It’s not about the physical media. It’s about the restrictions.


Why have you accepted this? Why would anybody accept this?!


And I hope it comes with royalties for the families.


Because it leads to echo chambers. It’s working for you now. Great. Then a few months later you get a totally different kind of content and you didn’t realize of that transition. Amd that’s not a good thing.

I’m not saying that will happen to you, specifically. But it has happened to a ton of people.


What adblocker are you using? Mine worked fine.

Anyway, here’s the article:

"

www.thegamer.com It’s Official: Marvel’s Avengers Is Gone Rhiannon Bevan

After just three years, Marvel’s Avengers has been delisted. Anyone who owns it can still play, but it’s a grim end for the live service. Multiple heroes from Marvel’s Avengers

It’s happened, Marvel’s Avengers is no more. Just three years after launch, the game has been delisted from all storefronts but will remain playable for anyone who picked it up before the takedown. You should still be able to play with friends, but any issues you run into won’t be addressed, and there will be no more events.

This makes for a pretty short lifespan, particularly for a live service with much grander aspirations. It’s also a far more dramatic move than most publishers would make, as many would just stop providing updates for the game. Instead, Crystal Dynamics owner Embracer Group has gone as far as preventing any new players from picking up the game, even though both single-player and multiplayer elements are perfectly playable.

Marvel’s Avengers at least ended on a slightly better note than it opened on, as the price was cut by 90 percent. This netted you the Definitive Edition, which includes all of the cosmetics and DLC for free. In practice, this should help Marvel’s Avengers feel like any other single-player game, rather than a live service that just had its roadmap come to an end.

Alas, the Steam reviews were still “mixed” by the time Embracer pulled the plug, so its chance for a comeback seems to have come and gone. Admittedly, there’s a reason support didn’t last long, as it struggled to find its audience in a sea of other live services. Met with mixed reviews from launch too, its audience quickly grew frustrated with its online elements, including controversial paid XP boosters around a year after launch. In terms of sales, it performed below expectations but continued to receive updates and expansions regardless.

Through it all, it retained a dedicated, if often frustrated, audience. They were never afraid to make their grievances known, but they would stick with the live service through thick and thin. However, it seems that this just wasn’t enough to please Embracer Group when it acquired Crystal Dynamics in 2022.

We’ll have to see how the future fares for Marvel’s Avengers, now that it’s been delisted. The generous 90 percent off sale is likely to have enticed a few would-be players who were on the fence throughout the game’s online run, so who knows? Maybe it will pick up a cult following through its offline offerings. Yet this probably won’t be enough to secure the sequel that some fans were after, especially with Embracer Group tightening its purse strings in recent weeks. In practice, this has led to numerous layoffs across many of the studios it owns, so hardly a time that Embracer bosses would want to take a risk on a series that’s already failed once. "


You’re mostly right, but I’m told that Pixels have features that no other Android phones have. So, in a way, Pixels also have “extra features.”

Plus for some people, “barebones” here is actually a good thing.


You’re technically correct, but again: It’s not that the fairphone costs a lot more. It’s that the other phones cost a lot less for horrible reasons.


Lacking what? What are you running that a chipset from last year will be struggling?


You don’t actually pay a lot. You pay what is fair. The only reason other phones cost less, that is, cheaper is, precisely, because of all the shortcuts these corporations unethically took.

For example: a burger shop can offer you a $4.99 burger, or the same burger at $0.49 with stolen meat processed by underpaid employees working 7 days a week for 12 hours. You get used to the $0.49 deal, then you start seeing the $4.99 burger as “very expensive.”


Which is bullshit. It reminds me of when web email services offered ridiculously small inbox sizes, such as 25MB or 50MB. Then in came Google and offered 1GB, and all of a sudden all those companies found the way to match Google’s offering.

But I guess if people are willing to pay for those ridiculous prices, and deal with in-game payments… shrug.


Sure, but are we talking about people who buy the game, or people in general bashing at the price? They’re not necessarily the same group.

It’s like when Apple announced that $1000 monitor stand. It was laughable. Even if I won’t buy one, I bashed it to no end, because it was fun.



But why would it be pointless or uncalled for? $70 for a rather old game?

Edit: I’ve been schooled. Is a brand new game with a confusing name. Still $70 for a console game; yikes.


I don’t like how many posts cater to outrage lately, true.

But I don’t think this one is manufactured.



You’re describing the state of application/game development, yes.

But again, what was that rant involving other industries about?



You don’t have to explain to me how an electronic or digital phone works, but I appreciate the comment regardless.

And to be very technical: No, phones have not always been computers. I can’t do Turing-complete work with a rotary phone from the 70s.


Is it silly, though? Phones are essentially supercomputers at this point. It’s hardly excusable that companies can’t provide longer support.



Windows 11 can still run programs made for old versions of Windows. I think it can still run Win32 programs as well.

Office products can open documents in old formats.

So yeah, they care about backwards compatibility. On the hardware front, I agree with you.


I didn’t say 30-year-old macs wouldn’t run. As the matter of fact, that would be another example of the counter-claim that a 30-yr-old Sega Genesis can still run “while a surface duo couldn’t do the same.”



I can side with what you’re saying, but I don’t understand how forgetting something in the name of profit in other industries has anything to do with the pace of game development.




I understand the sentiment, but the comparison with Apple and the Sega Genesis is flawed.

Microsoft has been very good at supporting backwards compatibility with other products, and Apple has EOL’d products too soon as well.

Open a 30-yr-old laptop with Microsoft Windows 3.0 and, oh surprise, it also works… just like your Sega Genesis! Plus nobody said that the Surface Duo was going to stop working. Store it away for 30 years amd turn it back on. I’m sure it will work just fine. Just don’t attempt to connect it to the Internet 18.0.



Edit: the article mentions what I wrote below.

I’m guessing this is to avoid accidental installs and thus:

  • minimizing the spread of malware.
  • reducing downloads, which cost money.

I have a good DVD collection I’ve amassed by buying them second hand in thrift stores, and for titles I really want to own.


Why? You’re giving the people who ruined streaming more money.


Don’t get me started with the unskippable intro screens.