Also find me on db0 and lemmy.world!
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/lka1988
https://lemmy.world/u/lka1988
I remember you have to install the custom bootloader like TWRP to flash the ROM and there was this thing with A and B partitions. Not sure if things change…
Custom recovery on bootloader-unlockable devices is required if you want to do everything on-device. You can still flash ROMs without a custom recovery. I don’t have a custom recovery on my P9PXL, but that’s only because there isn’t one…
Workarounds on locked devices usually install a custom recovery as part of that workaround. Last night, I installed LOS on one of my kids’ old Kindle Fire tablets. Amazon makes it really difficult, there’s a whole series of scripts and commands just to get TWRP installed. But once that’s done, you can load a ROM and flash it on-device.
The question has already been answered. No point in me saying the same thing as others, but this question will always be asked regardless, so I pointed out the obvious thing people don’t like to accept: If you’re asking random internet strangers, then you’re not important enough to need this kind of security.
There’s pretty much no reason for the average Joe to worry about this kind of thing. If that was the case, they would already be acutely aware of the security risks imposed by unlocking the bootloader and installing a custom ROM. The biggest threat to mobile devices is physical access - but if someone has physical access to your device, all bets are off anyway.
Instead you are actibg pretentious and unhelpful.
I know it sounds rude, but there really isn’t any other way to explain this.

now with the Pixel device-specific code being closed sourced
I have yet to update my Pixel to Android 16 specifically because of this.
Calyx is going to be my next update. I say that a lot, but I’ve been methodically going through all of my apps and making sure everything I use will work on a de-googled ROM. It takes time.
These 6.5" and 7" phones don’t fit in pants pockets. Yet I don’t see any guys out there wearing fanny packs or carrying purses around with them like women. Where do they stick them? Are they all sticking their phones up their butts?
Let’s play “where’s the Pixel 9 Pro XL in a case with a magsafe wallet attached”:

First and foremost: nobody buys them. Manufacturers would build smaller versions of their flagships, but many would be severely limited or use lower-spec parts compared to said flagships. Or, the models that were high-spec like their larger siblings would cost almost as much, and so the average person will just get the bigger one because to most people, bigger = better.
It may not make sense to those of us more familiar with tech, but that’s not the point.
Also - nobody has heard of Sharp Aquos phones. I’ve got one of their TVs (from 2007 lol), but even I didn’t know they made phones until this post.
Well, no. It’s a full-blown Debian VM running on your portable Linux-based device, with its own virtual network adapter that accesses the internet via NAT through your phone’s physical network adapter. Just like a VM on a normal server.
The terminal program used to access said VM happens to be a web app. Very much like Spice, NoMachine, and others. You can even SSH into it from Termux if you forward the port.

You’re not wrong, and I agree in that it feels like W10 is where MS finally got it right.
However, hindsight is 20/20, and those sentiments were definitely not felt in the first few years after W10 was released. Once all the big issues were worked out and people figured out how to remove the bloat/spyware shit though, it was a solid OS. I still run it on my gaming PC (for now - tested some crucial programs last night on my laptop running LMDE6, great success)
What did W11 add that we didn’t have before? A TPM requirement? Ads? AI slop/shovelware/spyware?
W11 right now is essentially a shitty skin on top of W10, with all that extra shit. The kernel is still version 10.x.whatever FFS 😅. But SHINY INTERFACE and ONEDRIVE

Just to be clear: Android is NOT becoming closed source! Google remains committed to releasing Android source code (during monthly/quarterly releases, etc.) , BUT you won’t be able to scour the AOSP Gerrit for source code changes like you could before.
Yeah, Pebble watches have a pretty loyal fanbase (including myself), and the r/pebble subreddit has been active for years despite the fact that they’ve been defunct for almost a decade. Google open-sourced the OS in January, Eric made announcements about creating a new company to make new PebbleOS-based watches, then yesterday his website (link in this post) started a countdown.
Now here we are.
I’m going to wait and see how these new watches fare in terms of reliability. I wasn’t a fan of the Pebble 2 and it’s issues, but that’s supposedly been resolved. These new units use essentially the same design, but with better materials and reinforcements.
That’s just Samsung’s version of “recovery mode”. Pretty much every Android device operates this way.