For PC gaming news and discussion.
PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
- 1 user online
- 60 users / day
- 251 users / week
- 892 users / month
- 3.41K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 7.43K Posts
- 61.2K Comments
- Modlog
Yeah but CP2077 is a stupid game to emulate as a reference. If that mess of a game can run at 30fps, then like 80% of the steam catalogue can run at 60+
Is that still true? IIRC it got a lot better post-release. It runs fine for me on what is now modest hardware.
I believe it got better, but my standard is just high i guess.
It absolutely is not true. The game runs amazingly, and has for years at this point. One of my all time favorites.
Wouldn’t that make it a great benchmark? It sits right at that sweet spot where if it’s barely playable then 80% of the other games are playable.
Usually the rule in software is that if it works for 80% of the cases then it’s a good product.
(This is also why software is shit 20% of the time)
You are right, in that sense its a good showcase.
It’s Crysis at max for the newer generations