There really should be consequences for top leadership when even 1% of the company has to go. I’m a businessperson. When you lay off a bunch of people it’s not because you suddenly discovered smarter ways to work in your industry.

95% of the time, It’s because you planned poorly. 5% of the time, events that could not have been planned for derail things.

If the workers have to suffer consequences for the organization to survive, fine. Take out the leadership who sent the company down the tubes with their orders in the first place.

100% agreed

but unfortunately mark has complete control and his board has no power

Create a post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

  • 1 user online
  • 30 users / day
  • 148 users / week
  • 457 users / month
  • 1.53K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 4.91K Posts
  • 53K Comments
  • Modlog