I saw someone play it and it looked very repetitive and the characters were kind of cringe and awkward like we knew their backstory and this was just an episode in their story.
I might play it if it’s like 80% off but I have better games in my backlog.
Also what’s with some of the reviews of it making up weird descriptions for it that don’t really describe games? Refreshing? Snappy? A throwback? A throwback to what? Shooter games are throwbacks now?
I wonder if that’s AI slop? Not saying the whole article is, mind, but if an LLM is used at any stage, it likes to inject superfluous, overly exact adjectives that don’t match the context.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
I saw someone play it and it looked very repetitive and the characters were kind of cringe and awkward like we knew their backstory and this was just an episode in their story.
I might play it if it’s like 80% off but I have better games in my backlog.
Also what’s with some of the reviews of it making up weird descriptions for it that don’t really describe games? Refreshing? Snappy? A throwback? A throwback to what? Shooter games are throwbacks now?
I wonder if that’s AI slop? Not saying the whole article is, mind, but if an LLM is used at any stage, it likes to inject superfluous, overly exact adjectives that don’t match the context.