What I don’t understand is why Intel was willing to lie so extensively. They knew they were going to get found out in a matter of months and that would do enormous damage to their brand. After the failures of 13th and 14th gen processors they weren’t likely to be believed anyway. It makes no sense.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Lmao.
“Made you look”
“Technically ‘up to’ includes situations that do not improve or worsen performance” - some guy who works in advertising
There must be at least one scenario where it’s improved 26%, otherwise it’s a lie.
Who cares. Buy AMD if you’re interested in quality. Intel fell off years ago and it is only going to get worse.
What I don’t understand is why Intel was willing to lie so extensively. They knew they were going to get found out in a matter of months and that would do enormous damage to their brand. After the failures of 13th and 14th gen processors they weren’t likely to be believed anyway. It makes no sense.