
Well, it’s not game development, but bugfixes and quality testing.
I dont know, but it does makes sense, when there’s still 30% work being done by human eyes. There will still be people checking everything through.
Even if they hit 50-50, they could put more money into the development.
The argument that they will just save the money only works as long as another company doesnt use it for game devs. Otherwise you naturally fall behind.
Yeah, I think I swayed too much into a general critic of a way of thinking about politics.
I still agree with you, when it’s a minister.
It’s also worth to note that his party, even though their name, is a middle party now and no longer left.
There are plenty of parties better for the people than them right now.

That’s a very interesting read!
If I should add a comment it is that when so many people need to vet you, it’s also very hard to force change in the sense of the people.
People rights are still a massive problem compared to the west, and that might be the reason why. Or maybe it comes in a wave later on. People rights was not a thing in the west either if you go 150 years back.

And they will continue to do so because of automatic factories, and investments in clean energy.
We can hate on a centralisied government all we want, but when it works, it works really well.
It’s also a little more fragile being prone to insane leaders. But so is the US. Real democracy is all they need now to get fully on track.

Pathetic.
In modern EU contries, the water going through data centers is hooked up to the central heating system, which means the central heating provides cold water, and in return they get hot water back from the data center.
This provides the houses with the warm water needed, and everyone benefits.
Instead the US is out here wasting massive ressources and achieves the same goal with alot of waste of money and a great environmental impact.
And now they also expand this stupidity to the rest of the world. Nice.

They could - UK being out of the EU gives them far less power.
Apple puts every decision into profits. Does breaking encryption do more damage than the profits of the UK market makes? If yes, they leave.
If this was an EU thing, the numbers would be entirely different, and they couldn’t just pull out. Now they might.

I don’t think it can backfire just because there’re rules. Backfire will be possible if a rule actually made it even more legit to use AI for this.
But it might end up changing nothing for some use cases.
And my understanding of EU bills is often that it will get reviewed and changed before it will go into voting again. In that way not only the proposer of the bill have something to say.
Still I agree with you - better than nothing and let’s hope it will get bulletproof.
Obligatory Welcome to Linux comment