@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
-11917d

It isn’t – it is a completely populist comparison that can’t be used as a meaningful argument.

CEOs work by this very same principle: say what people want to hear, making their beliefs even stronger and thus increasing their craving to hear that statement again. Repeat until something breaks.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
516d

Thanks Lembot.

lime!
link
fedilink
English
1317d

the analogy perfectly describes model collapse.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
7417d

You know analogy and argument are not the same thing, right? Like, not at all. I’m not the guy you replied to, but I definitely did not get the impression he meant anything even close to “meaningful argument”.

And you know what? I think he’s right; that is a very apt analogy when taking about sophisticated bullshit generators. Cause that’s the version they keep trying to sell to the public. This isn’t about data analysis or any other if the creative scientific applications of this technology.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
-5917d

This isn’t about data analysis or any other if the creative scientific applications of this technology.

But this is the only thing that matters. Who cares how people who don’t know, care or capable of using some technology are actually using it? Ammonium nitrate is poisonous if you try to salt a soup with it, but it makes miracles in the hands of those who know how to use it (if you like analogies)

Cause that’s the version they keep trying to sell to the public.

I am not a lawyer, but I think that even in the USA it isn’t mandatory to buy everything that corporations sell.

Modern LLMs are very useful tools. Just some people try to smalltalk with it for some reason. Their right. Salting soup with nitrates is also their right.

Rayquetzalcoatl
link
fedilink
English
2317d

Ugh yet another Lemmy user desperate to make the LLMs like them. Go chat with your chatbot friends and leave humans alone mate.

Truscape
link
fedilink
English
3217d

Oh goddammit, you’re here. Move on to Lembot_0006 already, ya contrarian doofus.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
16
edit-2
17d

Is that a user that is “unblockable” by dodging username blocks by iterating the name?

Truscape
link
fedilink
English
2617d

Yep, someone already joked that they picked 4 digits for their username so they have a failsafe for getting banned 9,998 times. That was at 0004.

If you look at their chat history it really explains it all tbh. I wonder if we could get this instance to defederate their account haven.

hzl
link
fedilink
English
116d

If you switch to the piefed you can block their entire instance.

Create a post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
  • 1 user online
  • 84 users / day
  • 288 users / week
  • 1.09K users / month
  • 2.89K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 6.73K Posts
  • 51.5K Comments
  • Modlog