This is equivalent to saying ‘guns don’t kill people, people kill people’ which is a way of implying you shouldn’t regulate the tool. The tool matters, and how its positioned and what it’s given access to do matters.
Sure but saying “AI killed kids” omits the people who are actually responsible. A person asked AI, a person gave the order, a person pulled the trigger. That’s what we should be focusing on.
A person didn’t ask it to kill kids they told ir to choose targets it choose school a school. I wonder how much over site it has they are saying AI choose the targets.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
AI doesn’t do things. People use AI to do things.
This is equivalent to saying ‘guns don’t kill people, people kill people’ which is a way of implying you shouldn’t regulate the tool. The tool matters, and how its positioned and what it’s given access to do matters.
Sure but saying “AI killed kids” omits the people who are actually responsible. A person asked AI, a person gave the order, a person pulled the trigger. That’s what we should be focusing on.
A person didn’t ask it to kill kids they told ir to choose targets it choose school a school. I wonder how much over site it has they are saying AI choose the targets.
I mean when you tell it to choose targets and five it the ability to shoot missiles. Tomatoes tomato.