Roblox is starting to roll out the mandatory age checks that will require all of its users to submit an ID or scan their face in order to access the platform's chat features.
@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
401M

Pedo app asking for pictures of children. Ban Roblox already, Jesus Crist.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
991M

I’d be far happier if they just shut down chat under 18. The pedos will find a way to get through otherwise.

lime!
link
fedilink
English
391M

…and how do you verify that chatters are over 18?

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
6
edit-2
1M

While I don’t love age verification, taking 3d webcam scans from adults won’t create a catalog of kids.

edit: and to clarify, IDGAF about chat ID verifications for almost all sites, but Roblox is marketed explicitly toward and occupied by children.

lime!
link
fedilink
English
61M

either way you’re creating a database of people’s faces. it’s gonna be handled by a third party no matter what so whether you’re above or below the cutoff is just a flag.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
11M

What’s stopping them from running a client model? Why even send the images home?

lime!
link
fedilink
English
41M

the fact that they want the data.

kbobabob
link
fedilink
English
41M

the fact that they want sell the data.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
26
edit-2
1M

no amount of age verification/id controls is stopping bad parents from failing their kids, it’s a pointless waste of time which ultimately opens up these kids/people to being even more vulnerable when somebody hacks their database.

if you run a business that provides some digital entertainment service to children, and facilitates their communication while using it…the only way your stopping groomers (or just generally keeping it from turning into a cesspool) is by actually paying people to moderate the chat rooms, simple as that

and, atleast in an unregulated shithole like the US…the only way they’ll do that is if they end up being held liable under some class action lawsuit

small communities like this are work because the population using it is still relatively small

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
3
edit-2
1M

Ask for verification only to enable chat. So at least in theory it’s only adults.

Or, you know; don’t.

lime!
link
fedilink
English
61M

i mean, to matter which way you go you’ll have created a database of people’s real identities. which is a problem.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
31M

Yeah but at least it wouldn’t be mostly children.

lime!
link
fedilink
English
21M

did you bypass verification prompts as a child? so will they.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
3
edit-2
1M

Yes, and Ana von mcfakenamesdottir the third, born jan1 1900 will be in the database forever.

lime!
link
fedilink
English
41M

hah.

personally i think a big part of the problem is that real-name identification for things that shouldn’t need it is just sort of accepted, rather than being criticised as the massive invasion of privacy that it is. whether it includes children or not is a side note in my mind.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
21M

Just send one (1) child picture.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
311M

Parents can turn off chat in the parental controls. Then I found my daughter chatting using the handheld “protest signs” in game that have customizable text…

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
6
edit-2
1M

It’s a losing battle, but it shows your child is clever and adaptable. You’re training them well.

unalivejoy
link
fedilink
English
71M

I would be willing to verify my age if it meant I didn’t have to play with children.

DebatableRaccoon
link
fedilink
English
48
edit-2
1M

No? Still no flags popping up? Bells ringing? Alright, I’m sure this is fine too. It’s keeping an eye on protecting the kids at least.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
101M

But we obviously can’t protect the kids if we don’t know who they are and therefore must have a database of all their faces.

DebatableRaccoon
link
fedilink
English
41M

Yeah, I’m sure that couldn’t possibly exist for ulterior motives. Bunch of fucking creeps.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
201M

How will it combat AI generated profile pictures? They’re literally everywhere now, I’m seeing them in brainrot mobile games even.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
21M

Well it’ll improve the AI profile pics to the point that you won’t recognize it’s AI. Can’t be mad at AI images if you don’t recognize 'em

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
12
edit-2
1M

Probably with a different AI that’s trained to spot that. Realistically, they won’t.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
61M

Yum yum, get those kiddy pics!

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
-261M

i’m sure this is sarcasm but i’m still going to assume you’re a pedophile

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
101M

👍

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
651M

… to access chat features.

I’m going to go ahead and click ‘No’

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
151M

“Sir, people keep using our service to get children to send them selfies! What do we do?”

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
41M

Too many kids know not to send pics to strangers, so now the Roblox devs gotta log off their alts and use power instead of deception.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
341M

Looks like they are building a menu…

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
21M

Release the Roblox Files!

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
1
edit-2
1M

welp, I caved and started letting my kid play roblox, where I would check in every now and then to make sure they weren’t chatting and just playing games.

But I might just roll back on this, and let other parents know what’s up too. Some parents are completely out of the loop with anything tech related, even in this day and age.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
71M

I’m disappointed this wasn’t the onion when I had to check.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
131M

Sounds like a great plan to me. I see no way this could go wrong.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
161M

What could go wrong

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
571M

How nice to ask kids who cannot consent to share pictures with that company…

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
51M

There are too many people on the internet, let alone children.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
61M

What could possibly go wrong?

Create a post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
  • 1 user online
  • 86 users / day
  • 290 users / week
  • 1.09K users / month
  • 2.89K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 6.73K Posts
  • 51.5K Comments
  • Modlog